STXtreme vs. Omnia vs. Orban: Audio Processor Comparison for FM Radio
A fair, detailed comparison of today's leading broadcast audio processors — highlighting each product's strengths for different station needs.
Josh Bohn
MaxxKonnect Engineering
Choosing the right audio processor is one of the most important decisions a radio station makes. It shapes your on-air sound, affects listener perception, and can be the difference between standing out in a crowded market and fading into the background.
In this comparison, we'll look at three of the leading audio processors for FM broadcast: the MaxxKonnect STXtreme, the Omnia series, and the Orban Optimod. We'll be upfront — we make the STXtreme, so we have a bias. But we also believe the best way to earn your trust is through an honest comparison.
The Contenders
STXtreme by MaxxKonnect
The STXtreme is the first dedicated hardware implementation of Stereo Tool, one of the most widely-used audio processing engines in broadcast. It takes the processing power that thousands of stations already rely on via software and puts it in a purpose-built, rack-mountable hardware platform.
Key differentiator: Stereo Tool's processing algorithm in a no-compromise hardware form factor. No PC required, no OS maintenance, just consistent broadcast-grade processing.
Omnia by Telos Alliance
The Omnia line is a well-established name in broadcast processing. Known for a "loud and aggressive" sound profile, Omnia processors have been a staple in competitive markets where stations want maximum dial impact. The Omnia VOLT and Omnia.11 are popular current models.
Key differentiator: Deep integration with the Telos ecosystem and a processing style that prioritizes loudness and competitive impact.
Optimod by Orban
The Orban Optimod has been an industry standard for decades. Known for clean, natural-sounding processing, the Optimod line (particularly the 8700i) is often the default choice for stations that want "safe" processing that won't draw complaints.
Key differentiator: Decades of proven reliability and a processing philosophy that emphasizes natural sound quality.
Head-to-Head Comparison
Sound Quality & Processing Philosophy
Each processor takes a different approach to how audio should sound on-air:
- STXtreme: Leverages Stereo Tool's highly configurable multi-band processing. Stations can achieve anything from clean and transparent to loud and aggressive — the flexibility is unmatched. Thousands of user-created presets are available.
- Omnia: Tends toward a louder, more aggressive sound out of the box. Excellent for competitive markets where dial impact is the priority.
- Orban: Prioritizes clean, natural sound. The "set it and forget it" choice for stations that value consistency over maximum loudness.
Hardware vs. Software
The STXtreme is unique in offering dedicated hardware for Stereo Tool processing. While Stereo Tool can run on a PC, the STXtreme eliminates the risks of software-only processing: no OS updates, no driver conflicts, no shared CPU resources. It's always on, always processing.
Both Omnia and Orban also offer dedicated hardware platforms, though their processing algorithms are proprietary and can't be run on standard PC hardware.
Price-to-Performance
Without publishing exact prices (contact us for current pricing), we can say that the STXtreme offers a compelling value proposition. You get the full power of Stereo Tool — an engine that many stations already know and trust — in hardware form, typically at a lower price point than comparable Omnia or Orban units.
Support & Ecosystem
One advantage of the STXtreme: because it runs Stereo Tool, you have access to the massive Stereo Tool community, preset library, and processing expertise that's been built up over years. Plus, direct support from MaxxKonnect's broadcast engineering team — people who've installed and maintained processing chains in stations nationwide.
Which Processor Is Right for You?
Choose the STXtreme if:
- You already know and trust Stereo Tool's processing
- You want maximum flexibility in dialing in your sound
- You want hardware reliability without software maintenance headaches
- You're looking for strong value relative to processing power
Choose Omnia if:
- You're in a highly competitive market where loudness is king
- You're already invested in the Telos Alliance ecosystem
- You prefer Omnia's specific processing sound
Choose Orban if:
- You prioritize clean, natural sound over maximum loudness
- You want a proven, "safe" choice with decades of track record
- You prefer minimal tweaking — set it and forget it
The Bottom Line
There's no single "best" audio processor — there's the best processor for your station. All three products are capable of delivering professional broadcast audio. The question is which processing philosophy, ecosystem, and value proposition aligns with your station's needs.
We're obviously proud of the STXtreme, and we think the combination of Stereo Tool's flexibility with dedicated hardware reliability is compelling. But we'd rather you make the right choice for your station than pressure you into ours. That's how we build relationships that last.
Want to hear the STXtreme for yourself? Request a demo or learn more about the STXtreme.
Ready to Upgrade Your Broadcast Technology?
Talk to our team about connectivity, engineering, or products.
Talk to an Expert